The concept of destiny is that "all" physical events are predetermined. Therefore, the act of choice or the notion of free will or luck is nothing more than a mirage. For if all events are predetermined, then all events that have taken place or will take place, have been, and are "assumed" to be ... certain. This assumption of predetermined events being exclusively certain has been debunked by the results of the Tempt Destiny experiment. After mapping the results of the Tempt Destiny experiment, the empirical evidence infers that there are two types of selections which in turn predetermine the probable and certain behavioral physical states (events) that follow. The notion that physical events are predetermined is correct. However, the notion that predetermined events are exclusively certain is incorrect. Evidence shows that events are a dichotomy, not a singularity.
This why it can be predicted that the search for famed Higgs Boson, a.k.a. God particle, will not be found with absolute certainty, if at all. How can I make such a prediction on the cusp of the CERN announcement that claims with "statistical certainty" that they have narrowed down the elusive Higgs boson to 95% certainty, "CERN physicists find hint of Higgs boson". Their results fall short of absolute certainty as obtained by the construct of the tempt destiny experiment. Anything short of absolute certainty is well ... probability. Being almost certain doesn't cut it. See for yourself by conducting the cup and coin experiment below.
Cup and Coin Experiment:
With a coin in hand, position your hand approximately a half inch over the center of a cup and ask the question - is it certain or probable that when you let go of the coin, will it go into the cup? The answer is self evident. The outcome of choosing to drop a coin "directly" into the cup is a certainty (+, +). Aah, but what if at the last microsecond the cup is blown away ... then you have no selection at all (+, -), i.e. non-existence because selection cannot take place without the chance of having something to select.
With a coin in hand, position your hand approximately a half inch over the rim of the cup and ask the question - is it certain or probable that when you let go of the coin, will it go into the cup? Here again, the answer is self evident. The outcome of choosing to drop a coin "indirectly" into the cup is a probability (-, +). Aah, but what if the coin lands on the edge of the cup ... then you have no selection at all (-, -), i.e. non-existence because selection cannot take place without the chance of having something to select.
SUMMARY - We take for granted the simple fundamental physical acts of choice as something we do in order to observe or measure the physical world around us. We focus on effects and how these effects cause other effects, otherwise known as hysteron proteron. An example of effectual methodology is what is practice at CERN by ignoring the selection process that takes place from the collisions between protons smashing into each other. Instead, the CERN program focuses on the physical effects that occur after these collisions. In other words, we understand the physical world only "after" the physical act of selection, not by the selection process that occurs first. Effectual methodology confines our understanding of the microscopic world to indeterministic behavior and confines our understanding of the macroscopic world to deterministic behavior because, mathematically speaking, effectual methodology is commutative.
As is evident by the graphs above, nature is mathematically speaking, non-commutative and symmetrical. When we understand the proper order of physical events and the variables involved, the paradox science has been struggling with of the existence of two contrasting physical behaviors is resolved. Nature consists of two distinct dichotomies. Together, they form one perfect symmetrical quadchotomy of physical acts which predetermines the second quadchotomy of physical behavior states of certainty and probability ... a phenomenon we call destiny.
See "Dr Quantum - Double Slit Experiment"
By understanding that we are physical systems govern by the laws of this system, it can be understood that we cannot act in violation of our own physical existence. What has been revealed by the Tempt Destiny experiment is that nature relegates us to only two types of physical acts of selection, not by accident, but as a matter of necessity.
On April 30, 2011, at the American Physical Society (APS) convention, I presented my research findings of the Tempt Destiny experiment embodied in my manuscript entitled: "Physics of Predetermined Events". During the presentation, I invited members of the audience to repeat/confirm the findings via the "cup and coin" experiment as illustrated above.
 |
 |
 Smithsonian/NASA Astrophysics Data System |
Home I Legacy I Program I Science I Stats I Store I Contacts
The quest for the next Tempt Destiny™ billboard is provided as a means for fans
to support their team and is not affiliated with the National Football League or NFL teams.
All Rights reserved. Designed and hosted by Morales Studio LLC Copyright © 2012
